Process and deliverables

The workflow is designed for reproducibility and scope control. Outputs are exhibit-ready when needed and readable by non-musicians.

Start via Musicologize Methodology canon

1) Intake and scoping

  • Define the narrow question (similarity, rebuttal, clearance, testimony).
  • Identify reference works and the relevant sections.
  • Set deliverables and level of formality (memo vs report).

2) Comparative analysis

  • Protectability map: stock vs distinctive features.
  • Element-by-element comparison (melody/harmony/rhythm/form/lyrics).
  • Recurrence and placement: where it appears, how often, and why it matters.

3) Exhibits and explanation

  • Tables with timestamps/measures and recurrence counts.
  • Annotated listening timeline aligned to the written analysis.
  • Transcriptions or simplified representations where useful.

4) Optional litigation support

  • Deposition prep: what you can and cannot say.
  • Rebuttal: claim narrowing, corrections, alternative explanations.
  • Testimony support where retained and appropriate.
This site summarizes process. The authoritative service pages and canonical intake live on Musicologize.